Whether “the panel decision is contrary to the following decisions of the Supreme Court and precedents of this Court: Am. Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Integrated Network Corp., 972 F.2d 1321 (Fed. Cir. 1992); Vaupel Textilmaschinen KG v. Meccanica Euro Italia SPA, 944 F.2d 870 (Fed. Cir. 1991); Buckhorn Inc. v .ORBIS Corp., 547 F. App’x 967 (Fed. Cir. 2013); Vanderbilt Univ. v. ICOS Corp., 601 F.3d 1297 (Fed. Cir. 2010); In re VerHoef, 888 F.3d 1362 (Fed. Cir. 2018); Pannu v. Iolab Corp., 155 F.3d 1344 (Fed. Cir. 1998); United States v. Dubilier Condenser Corp., 289 U.S. 178 (1933).”
