Petitions - Fed Circuit Blog

| Sitemap Contact Sign Up

Search By

Status

Subject

391 Petitions

Appeal No.

Case

Subject

Status

Question(s) Presented

Team Worldwide Corporation v. Intex Recreation Corp.

Question(s) Presented

“How much evidence is needed for a company with a patented, hugely successful product to be credited with secondary considerations of non-obviousness and maintain the validity of its patent claims?”

22-1815, 22-2005, 22-2113

NexStep, Inc. v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC

Question(s) Presented

“Whether expert testimony is always required to prove infringement under the doctrine of equivalents.” “Whether proving equivalence requires the same type of testimony in every case, or whether the proof of...

Weber, Inc. v. Provisur Technologies, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

1. “Does the Panel’s precedential decision articulate a new bright-line rule for determining whether a reference is a publicly accessible printed publication eligible to be used in an [inter partes...

Tehrani v. Hamilton Technologies LLC

Question(s) Presented

Whether “the panel decision is contrary to the following decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States or the precedents of this court: Para–Ordnance Mfg., Inc. v. SGS Imps....

22-1710, 22-1711

Jager Pro, Inc. v. W-W Manufacturing Co.

Question(s) Presented

“What is required for a patent owner to be accorded the presumption of nexus between a commercial product and challenged patent claims?”

Nichia Corporation v. DSS, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

Was “the Board’s disposition of Nichia’s IPR Reply arguments that were based on the non-planar construction of ‘mounting surface’ proposed by DSS and ultimately adopted by the Board?” And “if the...

22-1654, 22-1691

Contour IP Holding LLC v. GoPro, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

“Whether a claim’s recitation of an undisputed feature of the prior art can be a basis for patent eligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101.”

Brumfield v. IBG LLC

Question(s) Presented

1. “Whether the Federal Circuit, after holding, for the first time, that the Supreme Court’s WesternGeco decision permits damages based on foreign conduct in cases involving domestic infringement under 35...

Jump Rope Systems, LLC v. Coulter Ventures, LLC

Question(s) Presented

Whether “the collateral estoppel doctrine applies to a patent infringement action in federal district court when the plaintiff in that case previously lost on appeal before this Court on review...

22-1621, 22-1622, 22-1777, 22-1779

Dragon Intellectual Property, LLC v. DISH Network L.L.C.

Attorney Fees2 Amici

Question(s) Presented

1. “Whether the panel legally erred in determining that, as a matter of law, district courts have no discretion to hold a party’s attorney jointly and severally liable for fees...

Alexsam, Inc. v. Cigna Corporation

Question(s) Presented

1. Whether “the Panel overlooked facts and misapprehended the law when it found that Appellant waived its right to seek review of a stipulated claim construction.” 2. Whether “the Panel overlooked...

Alexsam, Inc. v. Simon Property Group, L.P.

Question(s) Presented

1. Whether “the Panel should have resolved the derivative claim construction, which does not align with the intrinsic evidence.” 2. Whether “the Panel incorrectly found appellant to have waived its understanding...

Ficep Corporation v. Peddinghaus Corporation

Question(s) Presented

“Does a claim directed to a patent-eligible (manufacturing) process or system remain eligible if part of the process is automated?” “Can a claim involving more than merely automating steps be patent...

In re Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

“Whether the legal inquiry for venue under 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b) turns on whether the employer’s actions have created a ‘regular and established place of business’ in the district, not...

Malvern Panalytical Inc. v. TA Instruments-Waters

Question(s) Presented

“What standard should courts apply when determining whether a claim term is a ‘coined term,’ i.e., a term that has no ordinary meaning to skilled artisans as of the filing...

22-1421, 22-1573

Sonos, Inc. v. International Trade Commission

Question(s) Presented

“Whether the International Trade Commission’s authority under 19 U.S.C. § 1337(a)(1)(B)(i) is limited to articles that infringe a patent as imported, or instead extends to cases where infringement can occur...

22-140, 22-141, 22-142

In re Google LLC

Question(s) Presented

Whether “the Panel incorrectly applied the ‘center of gravity’ factor rather than the binding Fifth Circuit private and public factors under In re Volkswagen AG, 371 F.3d 201, 203 (5th...

22-1391, 22-1425

Freshub, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc

Question(s) Presented

“Whether the Panel’s decision creates new law that contravenes this Court’s longstanding precedent that a system that only sometimes practices a claim is nevertheless infringing, by requiring a ‘narrowing’ claim...

Roku, Inc. v. International Trade Commission

Question(s) Presented

1. Whether “[i]n affirming the U.S. International Trade Commission’s (ITC) determination that Universal Electronics, Inc. (UEI) satisfied the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement, the panel misapprehended that, under...

Inguran, LLC v. ABS Global, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

“Does the absence of a specific finding of indirect infringement by a jury render a district court powerless to fashion equitable relief to address an infringer carrying out the infringing...

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11