1. “Does a protester need to be an actual or prospective bidder on the procurement at issue to be an interested party with standing to allege a violation of a statute or regulation in connection with a procurement or proposed procurement under 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)(1)?”
2. “Does the jurisdiction of the Court of Federal Claims to consider a protest alleging a violation of statute or regulation in connection with a procurement or proposed procurement allow review of an agency’s administration of the performance of a procurement contract?”
3. “Does the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act (FASA), 10 U.S.C. § 3406(f), which prohibits the protest of the issuance or proposed issuance of a task or delivery order, bar a protester’s challenge to the performance of a task order, [w]hich necessarily is directly and causally related to the issuance or proposed issuance of that task order?”
