Search
Search | Sitemap Contact Sign Up

En Banc Cases

Search By
Date Range
Subject
136 Cases
Date
Case
Subject
Question(s) Presented
Date
April 17, 1986
Case Name
In re Complaint of Leighton
Subject
Complaint of Judicial Misconduct
Question(s) Presented
May a procedural complaint levied against the whole court survive dismissal when it fails to allege any actual misconduct?
Date
February 28, 1986
Case Name
Gavette v. Office of Personnel Management
Subject
EAJA
Question(s) Presented
1. “[W]hether either the EAJA or the Back Pay Act is applicable to attorney fees and expenses incurred in proceedings before the board in this case.” 2. “[W]hether the EAJA is...
Date
October 16, 1985
Case Name
SRI Int'l v. Matsushita Elec. Corp. of America
Subject
Patent
Question(s) Presented
“Whether the district court erred in granting summary judgment of non-infringement.”
Date
August 1, 1985
Case Name
Bronger v. Office of Personnel Management
Subject
Employment
Question(s) Presented
“[W]hether, under 5 U.S.C. § 8336(e), petitioners’ time in the military in assignments having air traffic control duties is creditable as years of service toward early retirement from a civilian position...
Date
June 28, 1985
Case Name
In re Bennett
Subject
Patent
Question(s) Presented
“[W]hether the defective execution of the timely filed reissue application may be corrected after those two years had passed.”
Date
June 21, 1985
Case Name
Lovshin v. Department of Navy
Subject
Employment
Question(s) Presented
1. “Does Chapter 43 provide the exclusive procedures for performance-based actions by an agency?” 2. What is “the effect of amendments to Chapters 43 and 75 of Title 5 made by...
Date
April 22, 1985
Case Name
Paulik v. Rizkalla
Subject
Patent
Question(s) Presented
Whether an inventor’s “four-year delay from reduction to practice to his filing date [constitutes] prima facie suppression or concealment under the first clause of section 102(g), that since Paulik had reduced...
Date
February 27, 1985
Case Name
In re Etter
Subject
Patent
Question(s) Presented
1. “Must the presumption of validity, 35 U.S.C. § 282, be applied to claims involved in reexamination proceedings?” 2. “Did the board err in affirming the examiner’s rejection?”
Date
November 8, 1984
Case Name
Atari, Inc. v. JS & A Group, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Question(s) Presented
“Atari’s motion to transfer raises a single issue: whether this court has jurisdiction over an appeal from an order preliminarily enjoining contributory copyright infringement when: (1) the jurisdiction of the district...
Date
January 12, 1984
Case Name
Gardner v. TEC Systems, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Question(s) Presented
Did the district court err in finding the patent in suit, for a device used to dry ink on high-gloss paper, invalid as obvious under section 103?
Date
September 22, 1983
Case Name
Lindahl v. Office of Personnel Management
Subject
Employment
Question(s) Presented
“We decide here only the question of our jurisdiction to hear the type of appeal before us, i.e., an appeal from an MSPB decision affirming the denial of a claim...
Date
September 6, 1983
Case Name
Williams v. Department of Army
Subject
Jurisdiction
Question(s) Presented
Whether “the jurisdictional statutes . . . allow bifurcation of an MSPB decision for purposes of review.”
Date
September 6, 1983
Case Name
United States v. Connolly
Subject
Jurisdiction
Question(s) Presented
Whether the Claims Court possessed jurisdiction “to entertain wrongful removal actions by probationary employees of the Postal Service—whether or not such claims involve first amendment allegations.”
Date
June 22, 1983
Case Name
Harrington Mfg. Co. v. Powell Mfg. Co.
Subject
Jurisdiction
Question(s) Presented
Does the Federal Circuit have “jurisdiction to consider interlocutory appeals on questions certified . . . by a district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b)”?
Date
March 23, 1983
Case Name
United States v. John C. Grimberg Co.
Subject
Gov. Contract
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether the Claims Court lacks jurisdiction to grant equitable relief in a suit brought after a contract has been awarded.” 2. “Whether the Claims Court erred in transferring the case.”
Date
October 28, 1982
Case Name
South Corp. v. United States
Subject
Procedure
Question(s) Presented
“The court sits in banc to consider what case law, if any, may appropriately serve as established precedent.”