Search
Search | Sitemap Contact Sign Up

En Banc Cases

Search By
Date Range
Subject
27 Cases
Date
Case
Subject
Question(s) Presented
Date
September 16, 2002
Case Name
Jaquay v. Principi
Subject
Veterans
Question(s) Presented
Does the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims have jurisdiction to hear an appeal from the Board of Veterans Appeals when notice of the appeal was not timely filed or...
Date
April 1, 2002
Case Name
Forshey v. Principi
Subject
Veterans
Question(s) Presented
“[W]e granted rehearing en banc to consider the scope of our jurisdiction in cases coming to this court from the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims under 38 U.S.C. §...
Date
March 28, 2002
Case Name
Johnson & Johnston Associates Inc. v. R.E. Service Co., Inc.
Subject
Patent
Question(s) Presented
“[W]hether a patentee can apply the doctrine of equivalents to cover unclaimed subject matter disclosed in the specification.”
Date
November 20, 2001
Case Name
Commonwealth Edison Co. v. United States
Subject
Takings
Question(s) Presented
What is the “constitutionality of the Energy Policy Act of 1992, . . . which imposes special monetary assessments on domestic utilities for the remediation of environmentally contaminated uranium processing...
Date
November 29, 2000
Case Name
Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.
Subject
Patent
Question(s) Presented
1. “For the purposes of determining whether an amendment to a claim creates prosecution history estoppel, is ‘a substantial reason related to patentability,’ Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chem. Co., 520 U.S....
Date
August 11, 2000
Case Name
Raney v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
Subject
Employment
Question(s) Presented
“Are litigants who employ union staff counsel barred from receiving market-rate attorney fees when such fees are deposited into a separate fund controlled exclusively by lawyers and the fund is...
Date
February 9, 2000
Case Name
Hatter v. United States
Subject
Tax
Question(s) Presented
Was the application of the statute of limitations proper in Hatter VII, wherein the “question was whether the moneys wrongfully withheld from the judges’ monthly paychecks constituted a ‘continuing claim?'”