Home
Opinions
En Banc
Supreme Court
Other Cases
Administration
All Posts
Opinion Posts
News
SCOTUS Activity
En Banc Activity
Panel Activity
Search
All
Posts
Opinions
En Banc Cases
En Banc Petitions
Supreme Court Cases
Supreme Court Petitions
Other Cases
Search
|
Sitemap
Contact
Sign Up
Home
Opinions
En Banc
Cases
Petitions
Supreme Court
Cases
Petitions
Other Cases
Administration
En Banc Cases
All Decades
2010-2019
2000-2009
1990-1999
1982-1989
Search By
Date Range
Select Date
Last 7 days
Last month
Last 3 months
Last 6 months
Last Year
Older
Subject
Any
Asbestos
Antitrust
Attorney Client Privilege
Attorney Fees
Bankruptcy
Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act
Clean Water Act
Contract
Compensation Clause
Complaint of Judicial Misconduct
Copyright
Death Benefit
Disqualification
EAJA
Eminent Domain
Employment
Equal Pay Act
Errata
Fair Labor Standards Act
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Financial
Foreign Relations Authorization Act
Gov. Contract
Indian Tucker Act
IRS
Jurisdiction
Lanham Act
Little Tucker Act
Military
MSPB
Nuclear Waste
Order
Patent
Patent and Plant Variety Protection Remedy Clarification Act
Plant Variety Protection Act
Postal
Procedure
Pro Se
Public Safety Officers’ Benefits Act
Randolph-Sheppard Act
Rule 36
Rule 50
Sanctions
Standing
Takings
Tax
Tucker Act
Trade
Trademark
Trade Secret
Vaccine
Vaccine Act
Veterans
33 Cases
Date
Case
Subject
Question(s) Presented
Date
August 1, 1985
Case Name
Bronger v. Office of Personnel Management
Subject
Employment
Question(s) Presented
“[W]hether, under 5 U.S.C. § 8336(e), petitioners’ time in the military in assignments having air traffic control duties is creditable as years of service toward early retirement from a civilian position...
Date
June 28, 1985
Case Name
In re Bennett
Subject
Patent
Question(s) Presented
“[W]hether the defective execution of the timely filed reissue application may be corrected after those two years had passed.”
Date
June 21, 1985
Case Name
Lovshin v. Department of Navy
Subject
Employment
Question(s) Presented
1. “Does Chapter 43 provide the exclusive procedures for performance-based actions by an agency?” 2. What is “the effect of amendments to Chapters 43 and 75 of Title 5 made by...
Date
April 22, 1985
Case Name
Paulik v. Rizkalla
Subject
Patent
Question(s) Presented
Whether an inventor’s “four-year delay from reduction to practice to his filing date [constitutes] prima facie suppression or concealment under the first clause of section 102(g), that since Paulik had reduced...
Date
February 27, 1985
Case Name
In re Etter
Subject
Patent
Question(s) Presented
1. “Must the presumption of validity, 35 U.S.C. § 282, be applied to claims involved in reexamination proceedings?” 2. “Did the board err in affirming the examiner’s rejection?”
Date
November 8, 1984
Case Name
Atari, Inc. v. JS & A Group, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Question(s) Presented
“Atari’s motion to transfer raises a single issue: whether this court has jurisdiction over an appeal from an order preliminarily enjoining contributory copyright infringement when: (1) the jurisdiction of the district...
Date
January 12, 1984
Case Name
Gardner v. TEC Systems, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Question(s) Presented
Did the district court err in finding the patent in suit, for a device used to dry ink on high-gloss paper, invalid as obvious under section 103?
Date
September 22, 1983
Case Name
Lindahl v. Office of Personnel Management
Subject
Employment
Question(s) Presented
“We decide here only the question of our jurisdiction to hear the type of appeal before us, i.e., an appeal from an MSPB decision affirming the denial of a claim...
Date
September 6, 1983
Case Name
United States v. Connolly
Subject
Jurisdiction
Question(s) Presented
Whether the Claims Court possessed jurisdiction “to entertain wrongful removal actions by probationary employees of the Postal Service—whether or not such claims involve first amendment allegations.”
Date
September 6, 1983
Case Name
Williams v. Department of Army
Subject
Jurisdiction
Question(s) Presented
Whether “the jurisdictional statutes . . . allow bifurcation of an MSPB decision for purposes of review.”
Date
June 22, 1983
Case Name
Harrington Mfg. Co. v. Powell Mfg. Co.
Subject
Jurisdiction
Question(s) Presented
Does the Federal Circuit have “jurisdiction to consider interlocutory appeals on questions certified . . . by a district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b)”?
Date
March 23, 1983
Case Name
United States v. John C. Grimberg Co.
Subject
Gov. Contract
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether the Claims Court lacks jurisdiction to grant equitable relief in a suit brought after a contract has been awarded.” 2. “Whether the Claims Court erred in transferring the case.”
Date
October 28, 1982
Case Name
South Corp. v. United States
Subject
Procedure
Question(s) Presented
“The court sits in banc to consider what case law, if any, may appropriately serve as established precedent.”
1
2