1. Whether “[t]he panel’s precedential decision warrants rehearing because its treatment of the disputed limitation is difficult to reconcile with Phillips v. AWH Corp. . . . and this Court’s related claim construction precedent requiring disputed language to be construed in the context of the claim as a whole.”
2. “When a claim requires ‘initiating or changing return information which appears on the display through remote communication without assistance by a user with the computer,’ may a tribunal categorically exclude the user’s establishment of that required remote communication from the assistance inquiry, or must it determine—using the complete claim language and intrinsic record—whether that user act constitutes assistance to the claimed initiating or changing through remote communication?”
