1. “Whether patent ownership can be proven without a written document?”
2. “Whether the alleged infringer can waive its patent ownership challenge by not raising that issue explicitly in the pre-trial order.”
3. “Whether the alleged infringer’s assertion in the pre-trial order that it does not owe damages — even if infringement is found — implicitly and sufficiently raises a challenge to patent ownership.”
4. “Whether plaintiff’s mere oral testimony that it owns the patent-in-suit is sufficient proof of ownership?”
5. “Whether plaintiff’s mere oral testimony that it owns the patent-in-suit can shift the burden of proof to the accused infringer to disprove that the plaintiff owns the patent-in-suit?”
6. “Whether it is proper for a district court to have a two-part claim construction for a claim term and prohibit the parties from sharing one part of the claim construction with the jury?”
