Search
Search | Sitemap Contact Sign Up

Soto v. United States

 
DOCKET NO.
24-320
OP. BELOW
Fed. Cir.
OPINION
TBD
SUBJECT
Veterans
AUTHOR
TBD

Question(s) Presented

“Given the Federal Circuit’s holding that a claim for compensation under 10 U.S.C. § 1413a is a claim ‘involving . . . retired pay’ under 31 U.S.C. § 3702(a)(l)(A), does 10 U.S.C. § 1413a provide a settlement mechanism that displaces the default procedures and limitations set forth in the Barring Act?”

Posts About this Case

Date
Proceedings and Orders
September 18, 2024
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 21, 2024)
October 16, 2024
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 21, 2024 to November 20, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
October 17, 2024
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 20, 2024.
October 21, 2024
Brief amicus curiae of National Law School Veterans Clinic Consortium filed.
November 20, 2024
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
December 3, 2024
Reply of petitioner Simon A. Soto filed. (Dec.10, 2024) (Distributed)
December 4, 2024
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2025.
January 13, 2025
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/17/2025.
January 17, 2025
Petition GRANTED limited to the following Question: Given the Federal Circuit's holding that a claim for compensation under 10 U. S. C. §1413a is a claim "involving ... retired pay" under 31 U. S. C. §3702(a)(l)(A), does 10 U. S. C. §1413a provide a settlement mechanism that displaces the default procedures and limitations set forth in the Barring Act?