1. “If the allegations occurred of obstruction of justice, fraud on the court, and evidence tampering, which led to prejudicial losses with harmful error, can the CAVC and CAFC ignore it, or should they have gotten involved, and if they can disregard it, does this lead to an absurd legal position that cheating is okay, and thus should be abandoned forthwith?”
2. “Can the CAVC and CAFC replace allegations of cheating with unsuitable statements such as ‘We don’t have the jurisdiction to readjudicate the claim facts,’ especially when the . . . Justice lawyer agreed that the evidence had been switched?”
