1. “Whether the panel legally erred in determining that, as a matter of law, district courts have no discretion to hold a party’s attorney jointly and severally liable for fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285.”
2. “Whether the panel legally erred in determining that, as a matter of law, fees incurred by an accused infringer who prevailed in an inter partes review (‘IPR’) when the underlying litigation was stayed are never recoverable.”
