1. Whether “the Panel overlooked facts and misapprehended the law when it found that Appellant waived its right to seek review of a stipulated claim construction.”
2. Whether “the Panel overlooked Appellant’s argument regarding the meaning of the derivative term, ‘for use in the card system.’”
3. Whether “the Panel overlooked the totality of the evidence on infringement proffered by Appellant, which included qualified expert opinion and undisputed facts not examined by the Panel.”
