1. Whether “[i]n affirming the U.S. International Trade Commission’s (ITC) determination that Universal Electronics, Inc. (UEI) satisfied the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement, the panel misapprehended that, under the correct facts, the only ‘articles protected by’ the ’196 patent are televisions made abroad by a third party, Samsung.”
2. Whether “[t]he panel incorrectly found that ‘there is no dispute that the “intellectual property” at issue’—the ’196 patent—is practiced by UEI’s QuickSet software.”
