1. “Can a known patentable product become ineligible for patenting when it is claimed to be made by applying a mathematical model of the product on a 3D printer, as no one is disputing follows from Parker v. Flook?”
2. “And, can it be too much patent ‘monopoly’ to pre-empt (in practical effect) a mathematical model of a product, as no one is disputing follows from Gottschalk v. Benson, when it is known that it is not too much patent monopoly to pre-empt the real product itself?”
