“Whether 35 U.S.C. §315(e)’s IPR estoppel provision applies only to instituted grounds as this Court held in Shaw, and whether that interpretation remains correct after SAS Institute, Inc. v. Iancu, 138 S. Ct. 1348 (2018).”
“Whether a panel of this Court can sua sponte overrule a prior precedential decision and, if so, what the applicable legal standard is.”
“Whether a court must apply its claim construction, rather than a ‘plain understanding’ of the claim language, when evaluating whether substantial evidence supports infringement.”
