Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi, Aventisub LLC

 
DOCKET NO.
OP. BELOW
SUBJECT
Patent

Question(s) Presented

“Section 112 of the Patent Act provides that a patent’s ‘specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it,’ sufficient ‘to enable any person skilled in the art . . . to make and use the’ invention. 35 U.S.C. § 112(a). The requirement that the specification teach skilled artisans ‘to make and use’ the invention is referred to as the ‘enablement’ requirement. Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., 517 U.S. 370, 379 (1996). The questions presented are:”

  1. “Whether enablement is ‘a question of fact to be determined by the jury,’ Wood v. Underhill, 46 U.S. (5 How.) 1, 4 (1846), as this Court has held, or ‘a question of law that [the court] review[s] without deference,’ Pet. App. 6a, as the Federal Circuit holds.”
  2. “Whether enablement is governed by the statutory requirement that the specification teach those skilled in the art to ‘make and use’ the claimed invention, 35 U.S.C. § 112, or whether it must instead enable those skilled in the art ‘to reach the full scope of claimed embodiments’ without undue experimentation—i.e., to cumulatively identify and make all or nearly all embodiments of the invention without substantial ‘time and effort,’ Pet. App. 14a (emphasis added).”

 

Date
Proceedings and Orders
January 5, 2022
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
January 11, 2022
Response Requested. (Due February 10, 2022)
January 14, 2022
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 14, 2022.
March 29, 2022
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2022.
April 18, 2022
The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
October 5, 2022
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/28/2022.
October 31, 2022
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/4/2022.
November 4, 2022
Petition GRANTED limited to Question 2 presented by the petition.
November 29, 2022
Consent to the filing of amicus briefs received from counsel for Sanofi, et al. submitted.
December 1, 2022
Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Amgen Inc., et al.
December 15, 2022
Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including December 27, 2022. The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including February 3, 2023.
January 17, 2023
Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED.
January 31, 2023
SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, March 27, 2023.
February 3, 2023
Record requested from the U.S.C.A. for the Federal Circuit.
February 13, 2023
CIRCULATED
February 21, 2023
Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for enlargement of time for oral argument GRANTED.
February 21, 2023
Motion of Chemistry and the Law Division of the American Chemical Society for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for enlargement of time for oral argument DENIED.
February 21, 2023
Record received from the U.S.C.A.-Federal Circuit. The record is available on PACER, except for confidential materials which were transmitted electronically.
February 27, 2023
Sealed records received electronically from the U.S.D.C.-Delaware. The remaining record is available on PACER.
March 16, 2023
Two copies of model exhibits from the record on appeal received from counsel for petitioners.
March 27, 2023
Argued. For petitioners: Jeffrey A. Lamken, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Paul D. Clement, Alexandria, Va.; and Colleen R. Sinzdak, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.)
May 18, 2023
Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Gorsuch, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
June 20, 2023