“Whether courts can analyze the specification to determine whether a claim is directed to an abstract idea before considering the language of the claim;”
“Whether courts can disregard the claim limitations based on a quasi-enablement examination of the specification;”
“Whether, on a motion to dismiss, courts can disregard a plausibly and specifically pled inventive concept based on a factual determination that such inventive concept was well-understood, routine, and conventional at the time of the invention.”
