“Whether specific limitations recited in the claim language that describe the ‘claim advance’ over the prior art can be ignored in the court’s determination of patent eligibility.”
“Whether a claim that presents no danger of preempting an ‘abstract idea,’ either generally or in a particular field of use or technological environment, can be found ineligible for patent protection under 35 U.S.C. § 101.”
Whether “the panel decision is contrary to the following decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States and/or precedents of this court: Mayo Collaborative Servs. v. Prometheus Labs., Inc., 566 U.S. 66 (2012); Alic Corp. Pty. v. CLS Bank Int’l, 573 U.S. 208 (2014); McRO, Inc. v. Bandai Namco Games Am. Inc., 837 F.3d 1299 (Fed. Cir. 2016); Trading Techs. Int’l, Inc. v. IBG LLC, 921 F.3d 1378, 1384 (Fed. Cir. 2019).”
