VoIP-Pal.Com, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.

 
DOCKET NO.
OP. BELOW
SUBJECT
Patent

Question(s) Presented

1. “What is the appropriate standard for determining whether a patent claim is ‘directed to’ a patent-ineligible concept under step one of the Court’s two-step framework for determining whether an invention is eligible for patenting under 35 U.S.C. §101?”

2. “Is patent eligibility (at each step of the Court’s two-step framework) a question of law for the court based on the scope of the claims or a question of fact for the jury based on the state of art at the time of the patent?”

3. “Is it improper to apply 35 U.S.C. §112 considerations to determine whether a patent claims eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. §101?”

Posts About this Case

Date
Proceedings and Orders
July 16, 2021
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 30, 2021, for all respondents.
September 8, 2021
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
October 4, 2021
Petition DENIED.