HVLPO2, LLC v. Oxygen Frog, LLC

 
APPEAL NO.
19-1649
OP. BELOW
DCT
SUBJECT
Patent
AUTHOR
Moore

Question(s) Presented

“Whether or not the Panel’s decision that allowing any witness testimony on any aspect of obviousness, even using the standard dictionary definition of the commonly used word ‘obvious,’ by a non – Fed. R. Evid. 702 (‘Rule 702’) witness by a trial judge constitutes abuse of discretion.”

Posts About this Case