Search
Search | Sitemap Contact Sign Up

Emerson Electric Co. v. SIPCO, LLC

 
DOCKET NO.
19-966
OP. BELOW
Fed. Cir.
SUBJECT
Patent

Question(s) Presented

“Whether 35 U.S.C. 324(e) permits review on appeal of the Director’s threshold determination, as part of the decision to institute [Covered Business Method] review, that the challenged patent qualifies as a CBM patent.”

Posts About this Case

Date
Proceedings and Orders
January 30, 2020
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 4, 2020)
February 29, 2020
Waiver of right of respondent SPICO, LLC to respond filed.
March 11, 2020
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/27/2020.
March 19, 2020
Response Requested. (Due April 20, 2020)
March 27, 2020
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 20, 2020 to May 20, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
April 2, 2020
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 20, 2020.
May 6, 2020
Brief of SIPCO, LLC in opposition submitted.
May 21, 2020
Reply of Emerson Electric Co. submitted.
May 26, 2020
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/11/2020.
June 15, 2020
Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Thryv, Inc. v. Click-to-Call Technologies, LP, 590 U. S. ___ (2020).
July 17, 2020
JUDGMENT ISSUED.