1. “Whether it is proper to rely on the description of the invention in a patent-in-suit when combining references under 35 U.S.C. § 103?” 2. “Whether the panel erred by failing to follow Supreme Court and Federal Circuit precedent holding that inconsistent findings constitute clear error?” 3. “Whether the panel erred by failing to follow this Court’s precedential authority holding that inherency cannot render obvious claims that recite unknown and unpredictable properties?”
