Search
Search | Sitemap Contact Sign Up

Supreme Court Petitions

Search By
Status
Subject
475 Petitions
Docket No.
Case
Subject
Status
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
22-794
Case
Califorrniaa v. Vidal
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Petitioner wholly owns United States Patent No. 10,245,075 directed to a ‘nondestructive means of ectopic pregnancy management,’ which teaches a non-homicidal alternative to traditional abortion. He appeals from respondent’s 51-day...
Docket No.
22-786
Case
Faris v. Department of the Air Force
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Are federal employees considered a ‘person’ for the purposes of USERRA and thereby entitled to the Rights and Benefits guaranteed to ‘any person’ by Chapter 43 of Title 38...
Docket No.
22-7817
Case
Williams v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
22-774
Case
Delgado v. Department of Justice
Subject
MSPB
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether the Federal government can breach a contract without justification and subsequently submit allegedly false documentation, evidence, and affidavits to conceal the malfeasance.” 2. “What time frame must be surpassed...
Docket No.
22-7550
Case
Novilla v. Department of Agriculture
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
22-7490
Case
Phillips v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
22-7472
Case
Patel v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
22-7365
Case
Russomanno v. Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
22-7357
Case
Collier v. President of Stanford
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
22-7324
Case
Fisher v. McDonough
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
22-722
Case
Calapristi v. United States
Subject
Gov. Contract
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“In Lynch v. United States, 292 U.S. 571, 579 (1934) the Court held that when the United States enters into contractual relations, its rights and duties therein are governed generally...
Docket No.
22-7104
Case
Conteh v. Department of Commerce
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
22-6915
Case
McCormick v. McDonough
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
22-69
Case
Ampersand Chowchilla BioMass, LLC v. United States
Subject
Tax
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Congress has incentivized the use of renewable, alternative energy sources by providing tax benefits to taxpayers who produce electricity at or invest in qualifying energy property. Eligibility for these benefits...
Docket No.
22-671
Case
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation v. HEC Pharm Co.
Subject
Patent3 Amici
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether 28 U.S.C. § 46 and principles of sound judicial administration preclude a court of appeals from adding a new judge to form a new panel and redecide a...
Docket No.
22-6405
Case
Smith v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“The question presented for review is whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has so far departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings,...
Docket No.
22-639
Case
Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Subject
Patent3 Amici
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“The Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998 (‘FVRA’) establishes ‘the exclusive means for temporarily authorizing an acting official to perform the functions and duties’ of a vacant presidentially appointed, Senate-confirmed...
Docket No.
22-6223
Case
Woods v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “The Pullman-Standard, 456 U.S. 273 (1982), this Court developed which is the standard for reviewing jurisprudence for issues of fact and issues of law, and held the Court of Appeals,...
Docket No.
22-6093
Case
London v. McDonough
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Under 31 U.S.C. § 3702(b), ‘A claim against the Government presented under this section must . . . be received by the official responsible . . . for settling the...
Docket No.
22-605
Case
Military-Veterans Advocacy Inc. v. McDonough
Subject
Veterans
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether under the United States v. Munsingwear 340 U.S. 36 (1950) [holding that where mootness prevents appellate review, the decision below should be vacated] the Court should grant certiorari...