“Whether the ALJ legally erred in concluding that Celanese’s sales of products made by its secret, inventive process invalidate its patent claims on that process under the on-sale provision of...
1. “Whether the Commission erred in determining that Apple did not violate Section 337 on the basis that claims 16 and 17 of the ’499 patent are invalid for lack...
1. “Whether summary judgment on Teradata’s tying claim should be reversed because the district court erroneously (a) excluded testimony from Teradata’s expert economist; (b) refused to apply the per se...
1. “Did the district court err by failing to consider the combined weight and effect of evidence demonstrating Hikma’s repeated extra-label encouragement of using their generic version of Amarin’s patented...
“Did the International Trade Commission (‘Commission’) err when it found that claims 1, 2, 11, 15, and 21 of U.S. Patent No. 10,508,502 (‘the ‘502 patent’) are directed to an...
1. “Did the Court of Federal Claims err as a matter of law in dismissing Plaintiffs’ takings claim?”
2. “Did the Court of Federal Claims err as a matter of law...
1. “Whether the Board erred in determining that claims 7-9 and 17-19 of the ’499 patent and claims 3, 5, 6, 19, 21, and 22 of the ’731 patent, which...
According to Salix:
“Two patents claim methods of treating IBS-D using a specific dosage of rifaximin: 550 mg administered three times a day (1,650 mg per day) for 14 days.”
1. “In...
1. “Whether the district court erred in excluding evidence on invalidity and granting partial JMOL for plaintiffs on that issue.”
2. “Whether defendants are entitled to JMOL that claim 1 of...
1. “Article 3(n) of the Friant Contracts prohibits the United States from delivering San Joaquin River water to the Exchange Contractors unless and until ‘required’ to do so by the...
“Whether the Board’s decision was not in accordance with the law when it determined that it lacked jurisdiction to hear Appellant’s appeal based on its conclusion that Appellant has not...
1. “Whether the Board erred in finding that for the limitation ‘an LED circuit array comprising an LED circuit comprising a plurality of LEDs connected in series’ is properly construed...
1. “Does the issuance of an Order compelling a non-party to come from Texas to Delaware to testify at a post-dismissal hearing violate that non-party’s rights under Federal Rule of...
1. “Whether the district court erred in sua sponte raising and then granting judgment as a matter of law on patent ineligibility, an issue that was not tried because this...
1. “Whether enactment of the Veterans Appeals Improvement and Modernization Act of 2017 (‘AMA’), 115 Pub. L. No. 55, 131 Stat. 1105 (Aug. 23, 2017) really does permit the Board...
1. “Did the Trial Court erroneously conclude the United States Army Corps of Engineers’ (the ‘Corps’’) denial of Lemon Bay’s wetland permit did not constitute a categorical taking of Lemon...
“Section 9021(b) of Title 15 provides that the ‘Secretary [of Labor] shall provide to any covered individual unemployment benefit assistance . . . .’ Plaintiffs allege that they were ‘covered...
“Whether the district court—which found that “Crocs admits that its advertisements have ‘linked’ such terms as ‘patented,’ ‘proprietary,’ and ‘exclusive’ to features, characteristics, and qualities of the product material, and...
1. “Did the Government injure Textron (a requirement for claim accrual) (a) when Textron’s predecessor-in-interest curtailed and terminated the pension plans in December 2012; or (b) when the Government disputed...
