Home
Opinions
En Banc
Supreme Court
Other Cases
Administration
All Posts
Opinion Posts
News
SCOTUS Activity
En Banc Activity
Panel Activity
Search
All
Posts
Opinions
En Banc Cases
En Banc Petitions
Supreme Court Cases
Supreme Court Petitions
Other Cases
Search
|
Sitemap
Contact
Sign Up
Home
Opinions
En Banc
Cases
Petitions
Supreme Court
Cases
Petitions
Other Cases
Administration
En Banc Petitions
Search By
Status
Any
Pending
Moot
Granted
Denied
Withdrawn
Subject
Any
Asbestos
Antitrust
Attorney Client Privilege
Attorney Fees
Bankruptcy
Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act
Clean Water Act
Contract
Compensation Clause
Complaint of Judicial Misconduct
Copyright
Death Benefit
Disqualification
EAJA
Eminent Domain
Employment
Equal Pay Act
Errata
Fair Labor Standards Act
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Financial
Foreign Relations Authorization Act
Gov. Contract
Indian Tucker Act
IRS
Jurisdiction
Lanham Act
Little Tucker Act
Military
MSPB
Nuclear Waste
Order
Patent
Patent and Plant Variety Protection Remedy Clarification Act
Plant Variety Protection Act
Postal
Procedure
Pro Se
Public Safety Officers’ Benefits Act
Randolph-Sheppard Act
Rule 36
Rule 50
Sanctions
Standing
Takings
Tax
Tucker Act
Trade
Trademark
Trade Secret
Vaccine
Vaccine Act
Veterans
345 Petitions
Appeal No.
Case
Subject
Status
Question(s) Presented
Appeal No.
22-2248
Case
University of South Florida Board of Trustees v. United States
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
1.”May a Government License, 35 U.S.C. § 202(c)(4), in an invention ever be granted where no government funds of any type were ever provided in the making of the invention?” 2....
Appeal No.
22-2117
Case
Askan v. FARO Technologies, Inc.
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
Appeal No.
22-1963
Case
Mantissa Corporation v. First Financial Corporation
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“In analyzing whether a claim of a patent is indefinite, should courts rely on or prioritize (a) the claim language and embodiments in the patent that correspond to the claim...
Appeal No.
22-1391, 22-1425
Case
Freshub, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“Whether the Panel’s decision creates new law that contravenes this Court’s longstanding precedent that a system that only sometimes practices a claim is nevertheless infringing, by requiring a ‘narrowing’ claim...
Appeal No.
22-1253
Case
LKQ Corporation v. GM Global Technology Operations LLC
Subject
Patent
3 Amici
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“Whether the rigid approach to evaluating the obviousness of designs under In re Rosen, 673 F.2d 388, 391 (CCPA 1982) and Durling v. Spectrum Furniture Co., Inc., 101 F.3d 100...
Appeal No.
21-2348
Case
LKQ Corporation v. GM Global Technology Operations LLC
Subject
Patent
3 Amici
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“Whether the rigid approach to evaluating the obviousness of designs under In re Rosen, 673 F.2d 388, 391 (CCPA 1982) and Durling v. Spectrum Furniture Co., Inc., 101 F.3d 100...
Appeal No.
18-2170
Case
Bedgear, LLC v. Fredman Bros. Furniture Co.
Subject
Patent
Status
Moot
Question(s) Presented
Bedgear, LLC asserts that “[e]n banc review is necessary to secure and maintain uniformity in the Court’s decisions in all pending cases that raise the same important constitutional question whether...
Appeal No.
23-1805
Case
United Therapeutics Corporation v. Liquidia Technologies, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Whether “the Panel decision announced an unprecedented an unsupported legal standard for adjudicating the scope of [inter partes reviews].” Whether “the Panel’s holding that IPR petitioners need not provide any ‘evidence...
Appeal No.
23-139
Case
In re RingCentral, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Under 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b), absent venue manipulation, must facts supporting venue exist when suit is brought?”
Appeal No.
23-1362
Case
Vroom, Inc. v. Sidekick Technology, LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether a district court’s judgment on the pleadings in favor of the plaintiffs that all of the defendant’s asserted patent claims are invalid is sufficiently final for this Court to...
Appeal No.
23-1247
Case
Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether method-of-treatment patents directed to the effect of food on a particular drug are per se obvious because of FDA Guidance acknowledging that food may affect the bioavailability of...
Appeal No.
23-1246, 23-1436
Case
Traxcell Technologies, LLC v. AT&T, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Is a timely objected to Magistrate Judge’s Report & Recommendation, not yet adopted or approved by a District Court pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. §636(b), a final ruling for...
Appeal No.
23-1146
Case
Lite-Netics, LLC v. Nu Tsai Capital LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether the panel erred, as a factual matter, by expressing in a precedential opinion that Appellee did not argue for preservation of a preliminary injunction in part, if the panel...
Appeal No.
23-1048
Case
Plotagraph, Inc. v. Lightricks, Ltd.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“[W]hether patent prosecution history and claim interpretation have any effect upon how a claim is viewed under step one of the patent eligibility test set forth in Alice Corp. v....
Appeal No.
23-103
Case
In re Nimitz Technologies LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“[W]hether the district court may require that a litigant provide attorney-client privileged documents to the judge that is investigating the party, where the crime fraud exception to the attorney-client privilege...
Appeal No.
22-2217, 23-1021
Case
United Therapeutics Corporation v. Liquidia Technologies, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether an Inter Partes Review Final Written Decision from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board rendering unpatentable all issued claims should be considered in assessing an accused infringer’s subjective intent...
Appeal No.
22-2044
Case
Ikorongo Texas LLC v. Bumble Trading LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether Industrial Chemicals requires the Court to consider the original claims in addition to the specification when conducting a 35 U.S.C. § 251 [reissue proceeding].” “Whether the ‘clearly and unequivocally’ and/or...
Appeal No.
22-2042
Case
K-fee System GmbH v. Nespresso USA, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether the printed matter doctrine requires that a claim limitation bearing on patentability must have some functional relationship to the claim?”
Appeal No.
22-2001
Case
Fleet Engineers, Inc. v. Mudguard Technologies
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Appeal No.
22-1951, 22-1952, 22-1953
Case
Schwendimann v. Neenah, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Where the Panel is presented with inconsistent claim constructions from the Board and the District Court, is it permissible for the Panel to issue a Rule 36 affirmance without...
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8